A vs WAT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) and Waters Corp /De/ (WAT) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
A Agilent Technologies, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $49.47B
- P/E Ratio
- 34.5x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
WAT Waters Corp /De/
- Market Cap
- $45.46B
- P/E Ratio
- 95.0x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- A and WAT have similar market capitalizations ($49.47B and $45.46B).
- A trades at 34.5 times trailing earnings, WAT at 95.0 times.
- A carries 0.90 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.63 times for WAT.
- A yields 0.58% in dividends; WAT pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Laboratory Analytical Instruments.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $49.47B | $45.46B |
| P/E Ratio | 34.54x | 95.01x |
| P/B Ratio | 6.72x | 2.99x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | – |
| EPS | $5.08 | $4.87 |
| Book Value/Share | $26.12 | $154.66 |
| Revenue/Share | $26.15 | $47.27 |
| FCF/Share | $4.49 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.6% | – |
| ROA | 10.3% | – |
| ROIC | 14.0% | 1.5% |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | – |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 19.5% | – |
| EBT Margin | 22.5% | 4.4% |
| Tax Rate | 13.2% | 19.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.05x | 1.86x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.56x | 1.29x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.90x | 0.63x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.90x | 1.63x |
| Interest Coverage | 15.3x | – |
| Working Capital | $2.40B | $2.07B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.61B | $550M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.27B | – |
| Capital Spending | -$342M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 7.6% | -26.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 16.4% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 17.2% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.6% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.53x | 0.19x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.0x | 2.3x |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.0x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 3.5x | 3.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 73 days | 156 days |
| Days Inventory | 120 days | – |
| Payables Period | 65 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 128 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $7.37B | $4.64B |
| Operating Income | $1.64B | $330M |
| Net Income | $1.44B | – |
| R&D Expense | $485M | $319M |
| SG&A Expense | $1.84B | $1.25B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $3.40B | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | A | WAT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.01 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 19.9% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 282M | 98M |
| Net Income Growth | 18.0% | – |
| EPS Growth | 19.0% | -56.1% |
A vs WAT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, A or WAT?
A and WAT have similar market capitalizations ($49.47B and $45.46B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, A or WAT?
A trades at 34.5 times trailing earnings, WAT at 95.0 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, A or WAT?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.