ABG vs RUSHA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Asbury Automotive Group Inc (ABG) and Rush Enterprises Inc \Tx\ (RUSHA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ABG Asbury Automotive Group Inc
- Market Cap
- $3.71B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.2x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
RUSHA Rush Enterprises Inc \Tx\
- Market Cap
- $5.19B
- P/E Ratio
- 13.6x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- RUSHA is 1.4 times larger than ABG by market capitalization ($5.19B against $3.71B).
- ABG trades at 8.2 times trailing earnings, RUSHA at 13.6 times.
- RUSHA turns 3.7% of its revenue into net income, against 2.9% for ABG.
- ABG carries 1.95 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.99 times for RUSHA.
- RUSHA yields 1.15% in dividends; ABG pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.71B | $5.19B |
| P/E Ratio | 8.23x | 13.56x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.06x | 2.23x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.15% |
| EPS | $25.10 | $3.28 |
| Book Value/Share | $195.08 | $19.97 |
| Revenue/Share | $979.71 | $61.99 |
| FCF/Share | – | $2.99 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.7% | 11.4% |
| ROA | – | 5.7% |
| ROIC | – | 12.1% |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 5.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 3.7% |
| EBT Margin | 3.5% | 4.7% |
| Tax Rate | 25.1% | 20.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91x | 1.45x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.29x | 0.38x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.95x | 0.99x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 2.00x |
| Interest Coverage | 0.5x | 13.4x |
| Working Capital | -$305M | $714M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $770M | $674M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | $348M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$326M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -11.3% | -23.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -13.4% |
| FCF/Sales | – | 4.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 4.5% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 1.55x |
| Receivables Turnover | 69.9x | 23.8x |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.3x | 3.4x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 5.4x | 4.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 5 days | 15 days |
| Days Inventory | 50 days | 106 days |
| Payables Period | 20 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 35 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $17.59B | $7.24B |
| Operating Income | $746M | $371M |
| Net Income | $515M | $265M |
| SG&A Expense | $2.05B | $984M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $14.58B | $5.81B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ABG | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.51 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 15.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 18M | 117M |
| Net Income Growth | 0.0% | -7.5% |
| EPS Growth | -12.0% | – |
ABG vs RUSHA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ABG or RUSHA?
RUSHA is 1.4 times larger than ABG by market capitalization ($5.19B against $3.71B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ABG or RUSHA?
ABG trades at 8.2 times trailing earnings, RUSHA at 13.6 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ABG or RUSHA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.