FANG vs WDS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $53.86B
- P/E Ratio
- 37.2x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd
- Price
- $23.55 -1.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $44.77B
- P/E Ratio
- 4.6x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- FANG is 1.2 times larger than WDS by market capitalization ($53.86B against $44.77B).
- WDS trades at 4.6 times trailing earnings, FANG at 37.2 times.
- WDS turns 21.4% of its revenue into net income, against 8.4% for FANG.
- WDS carries 0.74 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.69 times for FANG.
- FANG yields 2.19% in dividends; WDS pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $53.86B | $44.77B |
| P/E Ratio | 37.20x | 4.56x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.42x | – |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | – |
| EPS | $5.17 | $5.17 |
| Book Value/Share | $135.35 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $61.07 | $24.27 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.8% | 27.5% |
| ROA | 2.0% | 14.9% |
| ROIC | 1.7% | 23.0% |
| Gross Margin | – | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 21.4% |
| EBT Margin | 10.8% | 29.9% |
| Tax Rate | 18.0% | 17.2% |
Financial Health
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.47x | 1.59x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.45x | 1.46x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.69x | 0.74x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.85x | 1.85x |
| Interest Coverage | 17.8x | – |
| Working Capital | -$3.03B | $3.21B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $10.14B | $21.58B |
| OCF Growth YoY | 33.8% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.24x | 0.69x |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.2x | 26.4x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 38.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 0.3x | 1.0x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 36 days | 14 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 9 days |
| Payables Period | – | 25 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | -2 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $17.10B | $46.15B |
| Operating Income | $1.08B | $14.07B |
| Net Income | $1.44B | $9.89B |
| SG&A Expense | $299M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $26.74B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | FANG | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $4.21 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 81.4% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 280M | 1901M |
| Net Income Growth | -62.4% | – |
| EPS Growth | -62.5% | – |
FANG vs WDS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, FANG or WDS?
FANG is 1.2 times larger than WDS by market capitalization ($53.86B against $44.77B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, FANG or WDS?
WDS trades at 4.6 times trailing earnings, FANG at 37.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, FANG or WDS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.