FIGR vs TREE: stock comparison and AI forecast
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and Lendingtree, Inc. (TREE) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
FIGR Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $4.89B
- P/E Ratio
- 27.6x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
TREE Lendingtree, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $380M
- P/E Ratio
- 2.3x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- FIGR is 12.9 times larger than TREE by market capitalization ($4.89B against $380M).
- TREE trades at 2.2 times trailing earnings, FIGR at 27.6 times.
- TREE carries 1.84 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.14 times for FIGR.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Loan Brokers.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.89B | $380M |
| P/E Ratio | 27.58x | 2.25x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.46x | 1.19x |
| EPS | $0.79 | $12.03 |
| Book Value/Share | $6.30 | $22.85 |
| Revenue/Share | $4.01 | $90.33 |
| FCF/Share | – | $5.26 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 56.6% |
| ROA | – | 19.9% |
| ROIC | 13.7% | 13.9% |
| Gross Margin | – | 96.4% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | – | 14.3% |
| EBT Margin | 26.1% | 4.9% |
| Tax Rate | -13.6% | -192.4% |
Financial Health
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.86x | 1.85x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.14x | 1.84x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.14x | 2.84x |
| Interest Coverage | 5.0x | 1.4x |
| Working Capital | $1.11B | $137M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$10M | $86M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | $74M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$12M |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | -3.5% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -4.5% |
| FCF/Sales | – | 5.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 1.0% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.30x | 1.39x |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.2x | 8.5x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 41.7x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 36 days | 43 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $899M | $1.27B |
| Operating Income | $237M | $104M |
| Net Income | – | $182M |
| R&D Expense | $96M | $43M |
| SG&A Expense | $626M | $1.09B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $46M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | FIGR | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 224M | 14M |
FIGR vs TREE: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, FIGR or TREE?
FIGR is 12.9 times larger than TREE by market capitalization ($4.89B against $380M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, FIGR or TREE?
TREE trades at 2.2 times trailing earnings, FIGR at 27.6 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, FIGR or TREE?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.