MBLY vs QTWO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc.
- Price
- $5.65 -34.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $4.55B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $4.39B
- P/E Ratio
- 64.6x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- MBLY and QTWO have similar market capitalizations ($4.55B and $4.39B).
- QTWO carries 0.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.04 times for MBLY.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Prepackaged Software.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.55B | $4.39B |
| P/E Ratio | – | 64.63x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.30x | 6.68x |
| EPS | $-5.15 | $1.09 |
| Book Value/Share | $18.33 | $10.55 |
| Revenue/Share | $2.46 | $13.96 |
| FCF/Share | $0.39 | $3.74 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| ROIC | – | 14.9% |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 58.4% |
| Operating Margin | -162.8% | 12.4% |
| EBT Margin | -160.6% | 13.4% |
| Tax Rate | 1.4% | 5.5% |
Financial Health
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.44x | 1.01x |
| Quick Ratio | 3.82x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 0.04x | 0.53x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 1.53x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 707.5x |
| Working Capital | $1.63B | $4M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $416M | $245M |
| Free Cash Flow | $317M | $233M |
| Capital Spending | -$99M | -$12M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -40.0% | 35.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -49.5% | 33.5% |
| FCF/Sales | 15.8% | 26.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.9% | 1.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 0.87x |
| Receivables Turnover | 9.9x | 9.2x |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.5x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 4.0x | 31.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 37 days | 39 days |
| Days Inventory | 104 days | – |
| Payables Period | 3 days | 21 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 138 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $2.00B | $870M |
| Operating Income | -$4.15B | $108M |
| R&D Expense | $1.10B | $165M |
| SG&A Expense | $966M | $390M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.03B | $362M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | MBLY | QTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 814M | 62M |
MBLY vs QTWO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, MBLY or QTWO?
MBLY and QTWO have similar market capitalizations ($4.55B and $4.39B).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, MBLY or QTWO?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.