NGS vs PUMP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Natural Gas Services Group Inc (NGS) and Propetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
NGS Natural Gas Services Group Inc
- Market Cap
- $419M
- P/E Ratio
- 22.2x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
PUMP Propetro Holding Corp.
- Market Cap
- $859M
- P/E Ratio
- 36.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- PUMP is 2.1 times larger than NGS by market capitalization ($859M against $419M).
- NGS trades at 22.2 times trailing earnings, PUMP at 36.8 times.
- NGS carries 1.44 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.56 times for PUMP.
- NGS yields 1.41% in dividends; PUMP pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $419M | $859M |
| P/E Ratio | 22.22x | 36.79x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.42x | 1.03x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | – |
| EPS | $1.46 | $0.19 |
| Book Value/Share | $22.83 | $6.76 |
| Revenue/Share | $14.69 | $9.95 |
| FCF/Share | $-2.43 | $-0.78 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.0% | – |
| ROA | 2.9% | – |
| ROIC | 6.0% | – |
| Gross Margin | 59.7% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 0.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.8% | – |
| EBT Margin | 14.7% | 0.4% |
| Tax Rate | 26.5% | 60.2% |
Financial Health
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.01x | 3.49x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.12x | 3.41x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.44x | 0.56x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.44x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 2.7x | 3.6x |
| Working Capital | $33M | $760M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $79M | $196M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$31M | -$96M |
| Capital Spending | -$110M | -$292M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 17.1% | 4.1% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -349.4% |
| FCF/Sales | -16.5% | -7.9% |
| CapEx/Sales | 58.3% | 23.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.26x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 8.6x | 4.2x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.6x | 35.9x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 8.6x | 1.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 42 days | 87 days |
| Days Inventory | 139 days | 10 days |
| Payables Period | 80 days | 67 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 102 days | 30 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $189M | $1.22B |
| Operating Income | $41M | $6M |
| Net Income | $20M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $28M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $76M | $930M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | NGS | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.46 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 31.5% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 13M | 123M |
| Net Income Growth | -11.0% | – |
| EPS Growth | 1.4% | – |
NGS vs PUMP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, NGS or PUMP?
PUMP is 2.1 times larger than NGS by market capitalization ($859M against $419M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, NGS or PUMP?
NGS trades at 22.2 times trailing earnings, PUMP at 36.8 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, NGS or PUMP?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.