ATO vs CQP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Atmos Energy Corp (ATO) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ATO Atmos Energy Corp
- Market Cap
- $29.14B
- P/E Ratio
- 20.6x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
- Price
- $63.03 -4.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $30.51B
- P/E Ratio
- 9.3x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- ATO and CQP have similar market capitalizations ($29.14B and $30.51B).
- CQP trades at 9.3 times trailing earnings, ATO at 20.6 times.
- ATO turns 28.5% of its revenue into net income, against 4.8% for CQP.
- ATO yields 2.17% in dividends; CQP pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Natural Gas Distribution.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.14B | $30.51B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.57x | 9.32x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.91x | – |
| Dividend Yield | 2.17% | – |
| EPS | $8.38 | – |
| Book Value/Share | $90.29 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $29.12 | $24.10 |
| FCF/Share | $-11.96 | $5.97 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.2% | – |
| ROA | 4.4% | – |
| ROIC | 6.1% | – |
| Gross Margin | – | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 29.9% |
| Net Margin | 28.5% | 4.8% |
| EBT Margin | 35.6% | 27.2% |
| Tax Rate | 20.0% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81x | 1.19x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 1.07x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.07x | – |
| Financial Leverage | 2.07x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 1.4x | 4.5x |
| Working Capital | -$344M | $256M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.02B | $3.44B |
| Free Cash Flow | -$2.02B | $2.89B |
| Capital Spending | -$4.04B | -$549M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -0.6% | 24.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 14.1% |
| FCF/Sales | -41.0% | 24.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 82.1% | 4.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.16x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.5x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 35.0x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 0.8x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 35 days | – |
| Days Inventory | – | 10 days |
| Payables Period | – | 6 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $4.92B | $11.67B |
| Operating Income | $1.82B | $3.98B |
| Net Income | $1.40B | $636M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $5.77B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ATO | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $3.74 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 44.6% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 169M | 484M |
| Net Income Growth | 21.1% | 0.0% |
| EPS Growth | 15.8% | – |
ATO vs CQP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ATO or CQP?
ATO and CQP have similar market capitalizations ($29.14B and $30.51B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ATO or CQP?
CQP trades at 9.3 times trailing earnings, ATO at 20.6 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ATO or CQP?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.