CLF vs ERO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Ero Copper Corp. (ERO) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
- Price
- $11.27 +5.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $6.43B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
ERO Ero Copper Corp.
- Market Cap
- $2.93B
- P/E Ratio
- 7.1x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- CLF is 2.2 times larger than ERO by market capitalization ($6.43B against $2.93B).
- CLF carries 2.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.05 times for ERO.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Metal Mining.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.43B | $2.93B |
| P/E Ratio | – | 7.11x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.13x | – |
| EPS | $-0.17 | $3.95 |
| Book Value/Share | $9.97 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $35.18 | $20.25 |
| FCF/Share | $-0.85 | $-4.56 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 41.7% |
| ROA | – | 20.3% |
| ROIC | -1.8% | 36.4% |
| Gross Margin | 1.5% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | – | 18.5% |
| EBT Margin | -3.5% | 23.4% |
| Tax Rate | 38.0% | 19.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.87x | 1.06x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.64x | 0.65x |
| D/E Ratio | 2.53x | 1.05x |
| Financial Leverage | 3.58x | 2.06x |
| Interest Coverage | 2.0x | – |
| Working Capital | $3.31B | $15M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $116M | $847M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$485M | -$475M |
| Capital Spending | -$601M | -$1.32B |
| FCF/Sales | -2.4% | -22.5% |
| CapEx/Sales | 3.0% | 62.6% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.99x | 1.10x |
| Receivables Turnover | 9.3x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.2x | 11.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 2.2x | 1.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 39 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 87 days | 32 days |
| Payables Period | 43 days | 45 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 83 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $20.07B | $2.11B |
| Operating Income | -$290M | $604M |
| Net Income | – | $390M |
| SG&A Expense | $575M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $19.77B | $1.24B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 571M | 104M |
CLF vs ERO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CLF or ERO?
CLF is 2.2 times larger than ERO by market capitalization ($6.43B against $2.93B).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CLF or ERO?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.