CLSK vs WD: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cleanspark, Inc. (CLSK) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CLSK Cleanspark, Inc.
- Price
- $6.16 -55.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.58B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
- Price
- $39.05 -28.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.34B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- CLSK is 1.2 times larger than WD by market capitalization ($1.58B against $1.34B).
- Over the last six months WD returned -28.8% and CLSK -55.9%.
- CLSK carries 2.55 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.57 times for WD.
- WD yields 7.00% in dividends; CLSK pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Finance Services.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $1.34B |
| P/B Ratio | 2.07x | 0.81x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 7.00% |
| EPS | $-2.09 | $-1.48 |
| Book Value/Share | $2.97 | $48.14 |
| Revenue/Share | – | $36.31 |
| FCF/Share | $-3.24 | $44.81 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | -1.9% |
| ROA | – | -0.8% |
| ROIC | -35.1% | – |
| Operating Margin | -52.2% | – |
| Net Margin | – | -2.6% |
| EBT Margin | -55.1% | -3.0% |
| Tax Rate | -5.6% | 22.5% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.91x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 2.55x | 1.57x |
| Financial Leverage | 3.55x | 2.58x |
| Interest Coverage | -75.3x | 13.5x |
| Working Capital | $765M | – |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$529M | $1.55B |
| Free Cash Flow | -$829M | $1.54B |
| Capital Spending | -$300M | -$15M |
| FCF/Sales | – | 123.4% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 1.2% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 0.29x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 2.7x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 135 days |
| Payables Period | 11 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | – | $1.25B |
| Operating Income | -$894M | – |
| Net Income | – | -$32M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $360M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CLSK | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $2.73 |
| Shares Outstanding | 256M | 34M |
| Net Income Growth | – | -128.1% |
| EPS Growth | – | -140.7% |
CLSK vs WD: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CLSK or WD?
CLSK is 1.2 times larger than WD by market capitalization ($1.58B against $1.34B).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, CLSK or WD?
Over the last six months WD returned -28.8% and CLSK -55.9%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CLSK or WD?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.