EAF vs SCIA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Graftech International Ltd (EAF) and Sci Engineered Materials, Inc. (SCIA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
EAF Graftech International Ltd
- Price
- $9.41 +5.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $253M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
SCIA Sci Engineered Materials, Inc.
- Price
- $9.70 +17.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $43M
- P/E Ratio
- 21.1x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- EAF is 5.9 times larger than SCIA by market capitalization ($253M against $43M).
- Over the last six months SCIA returned +17.3% and EAF +5.1%.
- SCIA turns 9.3% of its revenue into net income, against -38.4% for EAF.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Electrical Industrial Apparatus.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $253M | $43M |
| P/E Ratio | – | 21.09x |
| P/B Ratio | – | 2.62x |
| EPS | $-7.41 | $0.46 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $3.71 |
| Revenue/Share | $18.93 | $7.40 |
| FCF/Share | $-5.88 | $0.54 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 18.5% |
| ROA | -19.1% | 12.5% |
| ROIC | -12.2% | 19.8% |
| Gross Margin | -6.7% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | -21.0% | 10.7% |
| Net Margin | -38.4% | 9.3% |
| EBT Margin | -36.8% | 12.1% |
| Tax Rate | -4.5% | 23.0% |
Financial Health
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.55x | 2.60x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.86x | 2.04x |
| D/E Ratio | – | 0.49x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 1.49x |
| Interest Coverage | -0.9x | 8.7x |
| Working Capital | $373M | $11M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$113M | $4M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$158M | $2M |
| Capital Spending | -$45M | -$2M |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | 9.0% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -23.1% |
| FCF/Sales | -31.1% | 7.2% |
| CapEx/Sales | 8.9% | 4.8% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.50x | 1.34x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 28.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 6.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.1x | 9.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 13 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 54 days |
| Payables Period | – | 30 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 36 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $509M | $33M |
| Operating Income | -$107M | $4M |
| Net Income | -$196M | $3M |
| R&D Expense | $6M | $540K |
| SG&A Expense | $53M | $4M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $25M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | EAF | SCIA |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 27M | 4M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 89.4% |
| EPS Growth | – | 4.5% |
EAF vs SCIA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, EAF or SCIA?
EAF is 5.9 times larger than SCIA by market capitalization ($253M against $43M).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, EAF or SCIA?
Over the last six months SCIA returned +17.3% and EAF +5.1%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, EAF or SCIA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.