EAT vs TXRH: stock comparison and AI forecast
Brinker International, Inc (EAT) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
EAT Brinker International, Inc
- Market Cap
- $8.62B
- P/E Ratio
- 18.3x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $11.98B
- P/E Ratio
- 29.2x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- TXRH is 1.4 times larger than EAT by market capitalization ($11.98B against $8.62B).
- EAT trades at 18.3 times trailing earnings, TXRH at 29.2 times.
- EAT turns 8.4% of its revenue into net income, against 6.6% for TXRH.
- EAT carries 5.94 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.34 times for TXRH.
- TXRH yields 1.57% in dividends; EAT pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Eating Places.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.62B | $11.98B |
| P/E Ratio | 18.29x | 29.16x |
| P/B Ratio | 21.55x | 7.69x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.57% |
| EPS | $11.34 | $6.26 |
| Book Value/Share | $9.63 | $23.74 |
| Revenue/Share | $142.84 | $94.93 |
| FCF/Share | $14.47 | $6.19 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 125.2% | 26.5% |
| ROA | 18.0% | 11.2% |
| ROIC | 30.6% | 16.8% |
| Gross Margin | 74.4% | – |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 6.6% |
| EBT Margin | 10.3% | 7.8% |
| Tax Rate | 16.2% | 13.3% |
Financial Health
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.34x | 0.46x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.29x | 0.39x |
| D/E Ratio | 5.94x | 1.34x |
| Financial Leverage | 6.94x | 2.36x |
| Interest Coverage | 6.1x | 545.0x |
| Working Capital | -$422M | -$429M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $838M | $803M |
| Free Cash Flow | $601M | $406M |
| Capital Spending | -$237M | -$397M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 13.7% | 8.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 28.0% | 8.8% |
| FCF/Sales | 10.1% | 6.5% |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.0% | 6.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 2.14x | 1.70x |
| Receivables Turnover | 84.5x | 84.0x |
| Inventory Turnover | 46.5x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 5.9x | 3.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 4 days | 4 days |
| Days Inventory | 8 days | – |
| Payables Period | 41 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | -29 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $5.93B | $6.23B |
| Operating Income | $653M | $483M |
| Net Income | $501M | $413M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.52B | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | EAT | TXRH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $2.87 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 45.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | 42M | 66M |
| Net Income Growth | 12.8% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth | 17.5% | -4.4% |
EAT vs TXRH: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, EAT or TXRH?
TXRH is 1.4 times larger than EAT by market capitalization ($11.98B against $8.62B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, EAT or TXRH?
EAT trades at 18.3 times trailing earnings, TXRH at 29.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, EAT or TXRH?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.