EFC vs FOR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
EFC Ellington Financial Inc.
- Price
- $11.41 -13.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.47B
- P/E Ratio
- 9.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
FOR Forestar Group Inc.
- Price
- $24.55 -6.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.25B
- P/E Ratio
- 7.4x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- EFC is 1.2 times larger than FOR by market capitalization ($1.47B against $1.25B).
- FOR trades at 7.3 times trailing earnings, EFC at 9.8 times.
- Over the last six months FOR returned -6.4% and EFC -13.9%.
- EFC carries 9.68 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.73 times for FOR.
- EFC yields 13.95% in dividends; FOR pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Real Estate.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.47B | $1.25B |
| P/E Ratio | 9.75x | 7.35x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.75x | 0.67x |
| Dividend Yield | 13.95% | – |
| EPS | $1.17 | $3.34 |
| Book Value/Share | $15.25 | $36.39 |
| Revenue/Share | – | $33.81 |
| FCF/Share | – | $5.55 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.9% | 9.2% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 5.3% |
| Gross Margin | – | 21.4% |
| Net Margin | – | 9.9% |
| EBT Margin | – | 13.1% |
| Tax Rate | 1.5% | 24.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| D/E Ratio | 9.68x | 0.73x |
| Financial Leverage | 10.70x | 1.73x |
| Interest Coverage | 0.6x | 5.2x |
Cash Flow
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$618M | $284M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | $283M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$1M |
| FCF/Sales | – | 16.4% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 0.1% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 0.54x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 236.3x |
Income Statement
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | – | $1.72B |
| Net Income | $194M | $170M |
| SG&A Expense | – | $155M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $1.36B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | EFC | FOR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.59 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 135.9% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 129M | 51M |
| Net Income Growth | 71.5% | 4.8% |
| EPS Growth | -1.7% | 11.3% |
EFC vs FOR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, EFC or FOR?
EFC is 1.2 times larger than FOR by market capitalization ($1.47B against $1.25B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, EFC or FOR?
FOR trades at 7.3 times trailing earnings, EFC at 9.8 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, EFC or FOR?
Over the last six months FOR returned -6.4% and EFC -13.9%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, EFC or FOR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.