EPAM vs ZS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Epam Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
EPAM Epam Systems, Inc.
- Price
- $159.31 +52.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $8.22B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.9x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
ZS Zscaler, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $33.24B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- ZS is 4.0 times larger than EPAM by market capitalization ($33.24B against $8.22B).
- EPAM turns 7.5% of its revenue into net income, against -1.9% for ZS.
- ZS carries 2.03 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.30 times for EPAM.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Computer Programming Services.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.22B | $33.24B |
| P/E Ratio | 19.94x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 2.29x | 12.79x |
| EPS | $7.99 | $-0.39 |
| Book Value/Share | $69.67 | $15.93 |
| Revenue/Share | $109.50 | $20.56 |
| FCF/Share | $9.12 | $5.23 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.8% | -2.4% |
| ROA | 9.1% | -0.8% |
| ROIC | 15.5% | -2.7% |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 76.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -1.9% |
| EBT Margin | 10.3% | -0.5% |
| Tax Rate | 26.9% | -268.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.76x | 1.70x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.30x | 2.03x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.30x | 3.03x |
| Interest Coverage | 106.8x | 12.5x |
| Working Capital | $1.49B | $2.07B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $533M | $1.13B |
| Free Cash Flow | $470M | $852M |
| Capital Spending | -$63M | -$277M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 6.1% | 16.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 2.5% | 5.5% |
| FCF/Sales | 8.3% | 25.4% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.1% | 8.3% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.21x | 0.43x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 2.9x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 27.8x | 4.5x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 125 days |
| Payables Period | 3 days | 23 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $5.65B | $3.35B |
| Operating Income | $594M | -$133M |
| Net Income | $425M | -$63M |
| R&D Expense | – | $903M |
| SG&A Expense | $966M | $3.45B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $3.96B | $778M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | EPAM | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 52M | 163M |
| Net Income Growth | 14.4% | – |
| EPS Growth | 22.0% | – |
EPAM vs ZS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, EPAM or ZS?
ZS is 4.0 times larger than EPAM by market capitalization ($33.24B against $8.22B).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, EPAM or ZS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.