KMB vs PACK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
- Market Cap
- $67.78B
- P/E Ratio
- 11.2x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
PACK Ranpak Holdings Corp.
- Market Cap
- $311M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- KMB is 217.7 times larger than PACK by market capitalization ($67.78B against $311M).
- KMB turns 20.9% of its revenue into net income, against -8.3% for PACK.
- KMB carries 4.99 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.12 times for PACK.
- KMB yields 2.49% in dividends; PACK pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Converted Paper & Paperboard Prods (No Contaners/Boxes).
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $67.78B | $311M |
| P/E Ratio | 11.15x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 23.12x | 0.61x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.49% | – |
| EPS | $9.91 | $-0.41 |
| Book Value/Share | $4.78 | $5.99 |
| Revenue/Share | $25.72 | $4.90 |
| FCF/Share | $3.17 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 112.6% | -6.8% |
| ROA | 18.6% | -3.2% |
| ROIC | 20.6% | -0.7% |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | -1.7% |
| Net Margin | 20.9% | -8.3% |
| EBT Margin | 13.9% | -10.2% |
| Tax Rate | 24.9% | 18.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89x | 1.79x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.65x | 1.43x |
| D/E Ratio | 4.99x | 1.12x |
| Financial Leverage | 6.04x | 2.12x |
| Interest Coverage | 10.8x | 0.0x |
| Working Capital | -$721M | $64M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $3.38B | $44M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.94B | – |
| Capital Spending | -$1.44B | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 28.9% | 338.6% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 16.3% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 12.3% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 9.1% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.89x | 0.38x |
| Receivables Turnover | 8.0x | 9.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.3x | 9.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 2.2x | 3.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 46 days | 38 days |
| Days Inventory | 58 days | 38 days |
| Payables Period | 125 days | 42 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | -22 days | 34 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $15.78B | $420M |
| Operating Income | $2.27B | -$7M |
| Net Income | $3.30B | -$35M |
| SG&A Expense | – | $110M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $9.96B | $278M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | KMB | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $2.75 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 27.8% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 614M | 86M |
| Net Income Growth | 67.7% | – |
| EPS Growth | 67.7% | – |
KMB vs PACK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, KMB or PACK?
KMB is 217.7 times larger than PACK by market capitalization ($67.78B against $311M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, KMB or PACK?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.