NOA vs RNGR: stock comparison and AI forecast
North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) and Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd.
- Market Cap
- $340M
- P/E Ratio
- 9.5x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $328M
- P/E Ratio
- 22.2x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- NOA and RNGR have similar market capitalizations ($340M and $328M).
- NOA trades at 9.5 times trailing earnings, RNGR at 22.2 times.
- NOA turns 5.0% of its revenue into net income, against 2.6% for RNGR.
- NOA carries 2.99 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.53 times for RNGR.
- RNGR yields 1.28% in dividends; NOA pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $340M | $328M |
| P/E Ratio | 9.52x | 22.22x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.02x | 1.09x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.28% |
| EPS | $1.24 | $0.63 |
| Book Value/Share | $11.54 | $12.84 |
| Revenue/Share | – | $24.39 |
| FCF/Share | – | $0.76 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.4% | 4.9% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| ROIC | 7.6% | 5.4% |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 2.6% |
| EBT Margin | 6.9% | 3.7% |
| Tax Rate | 27.4% | 31.0% |
Financial Health
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.88x | 1.66x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.70x | 1.63x |
| D/E Ratio | 2.99x | 0.53x |
| Financial Leverage | 3.99x | 1.53x |
| Interest Coverage | 1.9x | 12.8x |
| Working Capital | -$35M | $63M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $165M | $55M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | $18M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$37M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 58.9% | -33.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -63.1% |
| FCF/Sales | – | 3.1% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 6.5% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 1.24x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 4.8x |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.6x | 152.2x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 2.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 76 days |
| Days Inventory | 38 days | 2 days |
| Payables Period | 51 days | 18 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 61 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | – | $571M |
| Operating Income | $77M | $20M |
| Net Income | $37M | $15M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $522M | $472M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | NOA | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.18 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 28.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 29M | 23M |
| Net Income Growth | – | -25.8% |
| EPS Growth | 37.7% | -27.6% |
NOA vs RNGR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, NOA or RNGR?
NOA and RNGR have similar market capitalizations ($340M and $328M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, NOA or RNGR?
NOA trades at 9.5 times trailing earnings, RNGR at 22.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, NOA or RNGR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.