PATK vs PHIN: stock comparison and AI forecast
Patrick Industries Inc (PATK) and Phinia Inc. (PHIN) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
PATK Patrick Industries Inc
- Price
- $81.75 -4.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $2.63B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.4x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
PHIN Phinia Inc.
- Price
- $70.79 -4.6% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $2.59B
- P/E Ratio
- 15.3x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- PATK and PHIN have similar market capitalizations ($2.63B and $2.59B).
- PHIN trades at 15.3 times trailing earnings, PATK at 19.4 times.
- Over the last six months PATK returned -4.0% and PHIN -4.6%.
- PHIN turns 5.2% of its revenue into net income, against 3.7% for PATK.
- PATK carries 1.84 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.60 times for PHIN.
- PATK yields 2.27% in dividends and PHIN 1.66%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.63B | $2.59B |
| P/E Ratio | 19.42x | 15.32x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.32x | 1.70x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 1.66% |
| EPS | $4.21 | $4.62 |
| Book Value/Share | $35.22 | $41.62 |
| Revenue/Share | $122.63 | $98.78 |
| FCF/Share | $3.98 | $6.20 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.0% | 12.4% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| ROIC | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 22.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.7% | 5.2% |
| EBT Margin | 4.9% | 6.8% |
| Tax Rate | 23.1% | 23.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.67x | 1.70x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.96x | 1.28x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.84x | 1.60x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.84x | 2.60x |
| Interest Coverage | 2.6x | 2.5x |
| Working Capital | $639M | $812M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $209M | $327M |
| Free Cash Flow | $128M | $227M |
| Capital Spending | -$81M | -$100M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -39.2% | 13.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -51.2% | -18.1% |
| FCF/Sales | 3.2% | 6.3% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.1% | 2.8% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.23x | 0.91x |
| Receivables Turnover | 14.2x | 4.0x |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.6x | 5.8x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 9.6x | 4.4x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 26 days | 91 days |
| Days Inventory | 79 days | 63 days |
| Payables Period | 27 days | 67 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 77 days | 86 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $3.94B | $3.62B |
| Operating Income | $265M | $302M |
| Net Income | $147M | $189M |
| R&D Expense | – | $114M |
| SG&A Expense | $364M | $475M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $3.03B | $2.82B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | PATK | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.85 | $1.17 |
| Payout Ratio | 43.9% | 25.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | 32M | 37M |
| Net Income Growth | 16.8% | 110.0% |
| EPS Growth | 14.4% | 82.6% |
PATK vs PHIN: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, PATK or PHIN?
PATK and PHIN have similar market capitalizations ($2.63B and $2.59B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, PATK or PHIN?
PHIN trades at 15.3 times trailing earnings, PATK at 19.4 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, PATK or PHIN?
Over the last six months PATK returned -4.0% and PHIN -4.6%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, PATK or PHIN?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.