GTX vs PATK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Patrick Industries Inc (PATK) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
- Market Cap
- $3.93B
- P/E Ratio
- 9.3x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
PATK Patrick Industries Inc
- Market Cap
- $2.63B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.4x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- GTX is 1.5 times larger than PATK by market capitalization ($3.93B against $2.63B).
- GTX trades at 9.3 times trailing earnings, PATK at 19.4 times.
- GTX turns 10.0% of its revenue into net income, against 3.7% for PATK.
- PATK yields 2.27% in dividends and GTX 1.58%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.93B | $2.63B |
| P/E Ratio | 9.28x | 19.42x |
| P/B Ratio | – | 2.32x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 2.27% |
| EPS | $2.18 | $4.21 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $35.22 |
| Revenue/Share | $19.45 | $122.63 |
| FCF/Share | $2.03 | $3.98 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 13.0% |
| ROA | 14.9% | 4.6% |
| ROIC | – | 9.4% |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | – | 6.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.0% | 3.7% |
| EBT Margin | 12.3% | 4.9% |
| Tax Rate | 19.1% | 23.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.04x | 2.67x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78x | 0.96x |
| D/E Ratio | – | 1.84x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 2.84x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 2.6x |
| Working Capital | $58M | $639M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $477M | $209M |
| Free Cash Flow | $395M | $128M |
| Capital Spending | -$82M | -$81M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 7.2% | -39.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 6.2% | -51.2% |
| FCF/Sales | 10.4% | 3.2% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.49x | 1.23x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 14.2x |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.7x | 4.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 9.0x | 9.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 26 days |
| Days Inventory | 47 days | 79 days |
| Payables Period | 135 days | 27 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 77 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $3.78B | $3.94B |
| Operating Income | – | $265M |
| Net Income | $377M | $147M |
| SG&A Expense | $244M | $364M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $2.98B | $3.03B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | GTX | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.32 | $1.85 |
| Payout Ratio | 14.7% | 43.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | 194M | 32M |
| Net Income Growth | 15.6% | 16.8% |
| EPS Growth | 55.7% | 14.4% |
GTX vs PATK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, GTX or PATK?
GTX is 1.5 times larger than PATK by market capitalization ($3.93B against $2.63B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, GTX or PATK?
GTX trades at 9.3 times trailing earnings, PATK at 19.4 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, GTX or PATK?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.