PD vs QUBT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Pagerduty, Inc. (PD) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
PD Pagerduty, Inc.
- Price
- $17.00 +148.2% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.28B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.9x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
- Market Cap
- $1.27B
- P/E Ratio
- 56.3x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- PD and QUBT have similar market capitalizations ($1.28B and $1.27B).
- PD trades at 8.9 times trailing earnings, QUBT at 56.3 times.
- PD carries 3.07 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.03 times for QUBT.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Prepackaged Software.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.28B | $1.27B |
| P/E Ratio | 8.87x | 56.30x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.50x | 0.80x |
| EPS | $1.83 | $0.10 |
| Book Value/Share | $2.95 | $7.03 |
| Revenue/Share | $6.29 | $0.04 |
| FCF/Share | $1.61 | $-0.23 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 79.3% | – |
| ROA | 19.2% | – |
| ROIC | 4.8% | -4.7% |
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | -18.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | -775.5% |
| Net Margin | 37.2% | – |
| EBT Margin | 8.5% | -152.4% |
| Tax Rate | -335.1% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02x | 53.13x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 52.44x |
| D/E Ratio | 3.07x | 0.03x |
| Financial Leverage | 4.13x | 1.03x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.4x | -120.2x |
| Working Capital | $292M | $970M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $131M | -$43M |
| Free Cash Flow | $127M | -$51M |
| Capital Spending | -$5M | -$8M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 11.3% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 10.0% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 25.6% | -524.0% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.0% | 85.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.52x | 0.01x |
| Receivables Turnover | 6.9x | 1.4x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 0.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 14.4x | 0.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 53 days | 255 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 644 days |
| Payables Period | 27 days | 205 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 694 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $495M | $10M |
| Operating Income | $32M | -$76M |
| Net Income | $184M | – |
| R&D Expense | $123M | $27M |
| SG&A Expense | $418M | $57M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $75M | $7M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | PD | QUBT |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 79M | 226M |
PD vs QUBT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, PD or QUBT?
PD and QUBT have similar market capitalizations ($1.28B and $1.27B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, PD or QUBT?
PD trades at 8.9 times trailing earnings, QUBT at 56.3 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, PD or QUBT?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.