PKOH vs TRS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Park Ohio Holdings Corp (PKOH) and Trimas Corp (TRS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
PKOH Park Ohio Holdings Corp
- Market Cap
- $625M
- P/E Ratio
- 22.7x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
TRS Trimas Corp
- Market Cap
- $1.37B
- P/E Ratio
- 1.6x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- TRS is 2.2 times larger than PKOH by market capitalization ($1.37B against $625M).
- TRS trades at 1.6 times trailing earnings, PKOH at 22.7 times.
- TRS turns 191.7% of its revenue into net income, against 1.6% for PKOH.
- PKOH carries 2.76 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.56 times for TRS.
- PKOH yields 1.25% in dividends and TRS 0.46%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Metal Forgings & Stampings.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $625M | $1.37B |
| P/E Ratio | 22.71x | 1.57x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.60x | 0.95x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 0.46% |
| EPS | $1.90 | $24.31 |
| Book Value/Share | $26.99 | $40.21 |
| Revenue/Share | $114.20 | $13.16 |
| FCF/Share | $0.81 | $-0.28 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.8% | 62.8% |
| ROA | 1.8% | 40.3% |
| ROIC | 6.5% | 0.5% |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | 191.7% |
| EBT Margin | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Tax Rate | 11.4% | -994.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.40x | 5.44x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.26x | 5.03x |
| D/E Ratio | 2.76x | 0.56x |
| Financial Leverage | 3.76x | 1.56x |
| Interest Coverage | 1.0x | 1.3x |
| Working Capital | $523M | $1.26B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $59M | $20M |
| Free Cash Flow | $12M | -$10M |
| Capital Spending | -$47M | -$30M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 468.9% | -77.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -131.3% |
| FCF/Sales | 0.7% | -2.1% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.8% | 6.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.13x | 0.21x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.7x | 3.1x |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.2x | 3.3x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 8.1x | 2.0x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 64 days | 119 days |
| Days Inventory | 114 days | 109 days |
| Payables Period | – | 210 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 18 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.65B | $472M |
| Operating Income | $72M | $10M |
| Net Income | $26M | $905M |
| SG&A Expense | $199M | $101M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.37B | $389M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | PKOH | TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.54 | $0.18 |
| Payout Ratio | 28.4% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | 14M | 36M |
| Net Income Growth | -4.7% | 2326.2% |
| EPS Growth | -11.2% | 3230.1% |
PKOH vs TRS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, PKOH or TRS?
TRS is 2.2 times larger than PKOH by market capitalization ($1.37B against $625M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, PKOH or TRS?
TRS trades at 1.6 times trailing earnings, PKOH at 22.7 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, PKOH or TRS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.