AMAT vs ARM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Applied Materials Inc /De (AMAT) and Arm Holdings Plc /Uk (ARM) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
- Price
- $374.53 -4.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $297.23B
- P/E Ratio
- 32.3x
- Size
- mega-cap
- AI Forecast
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
- Price
- $228.77 +8.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $244.33B
- P/E Ratio
- 233.4x
- Size
- mega-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- AMAT is 1.2 times larger than ARM by market capitalization ($297.23B against $244.33B).
- AMAT trades at 32.3 times trailing earnings, ARM at 233.4 times.
- Over the last six months ARM returned +8.8% and AMAT -4.3%.
- AMAT turns 30.1% of its revenue into net income, against 20.2% for ARM.
- AMAT carries 0.70 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.30 times for ARM.
- AMAT yields 0.51% in dividends; ARM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Semiconductors & Related Devices.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $297.23B | $244.33B |
| P/E Ratio | 32.34x | 233.44x |
| P/B Ratio | 11.60x | 28.31x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.51% | – |
| EPS | $11.58 | $0.98 |
| Book Value/Share | $32.29 | $8.08 |
| Revenue/Share | $38.86 | $4.83 |
| FCF/Share | $7.09 | $1.41 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 36.2% | 12.1% |
| ROA | 21.3% | 9.3% |
| ROIC | 27.6% | 8.8% |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | 97.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 30.1% | 20.2% |
| EBT Margin | 34.8% | 24.5% |
| Tax Rate | 13.6% | 17.4% |
Financial Health
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.42x | 5.25x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.79x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 0.70x | 0.30x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.70x | 1.30x |
| Interest Coverage | 42.1x | – |
| Working Capital | $14.74B | $5.13B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $8.40B | $2.09B |
| Free Cash Flow | $5.62B | $1.51B |
| Capital Spending | -$2.77B | -$588M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 9.0% | 105.5% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -3.4% | 123.1% |
| FCF/Sales | 18.2% | 29.2% |
| CapEx/Sales | 9.0% | 11.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.71x | 0.46x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.0x | 4.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.4x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 5.5x | 5.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 91 days | 79 days |
| Days Inventory | 154 days | – |
| Payables Period | 56 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 189 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $30.84B | $5.16B |
| Operating Income | $9.14B | $877M |
| Net Income | $9.27B | $1.04B |
| R&D Expense | $3.97B | $2.96B |
| SG&A Expense | $101M | $1.17B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $15.60B | $127M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.91 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 16.5% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 794M | 1068M |
| Net Income Growth | 35.6% | 49.4% |
| EPS Growth | 38.0% | 48.5% |
AMAT vs ARM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, AMAT or ARM?
AMAT is 1.2 times larger than ARM by market capitalization ($297.23B against $244.33B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, AMAT or ARM?
AMAT trades at 32.3 times trailing earnings, ARM at 233.4 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, AMAT or ARM?
Over the last six months ARM returned +8.8% and AMAT -4.3%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, AMAT or ARM?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.