ARM vs MRVL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Arm Holdings Plc /Uk (ARM) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
- Price
- $228.77 +8.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $244.33B
- P/E Ratio
- 233.4x
- Size
- mega-cap
- AI Forecast
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
- Price
- $218.34 +32.2% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $191.46B
- P/E Ratio
- 68.7x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- ARM is 1.3 times larger than MRVL by market capitalization ($244.33B against $191.46B).
- MRVL trades at 68.7 times trailing earnings, ARM at 233.4 times.
- Over the last six months MRVL returned +32.2% and ARM +8.8%.
- MRVL turns 27.9% of its revenue into net income, against 20.2% for ARM.
- MRVL carries 0.49 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.30 times for ARM.
- MRVL yields 0.11% in dividends; ARM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Semiconductors & Related Devices.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $244.33B | $191.46B |
| P/E Ratio | 233.44x | 68.66x |
| P/B Ratio | 28.31x | 10.33x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 0.11% |
| EPS | $0.98 | $3.18 |
| Book Value/Share | $8.08 | $21.13 |
| Revenue/Share | $4.83 | $10.78 |
| FCF/Share | $1.41 | $1.97 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.1% | 14.2% |
| ROA | 9.3% | 9.6% |
| ROIC | 8.8% | 6.2% |
| Gross Margin | 97.5% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 27.9% |
| EBT Margin | 24.5% | 34.8% |
| Tax Rate | 17.4% | 12.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.25x | 3.17x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 2.62x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.30x | 0.49x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.30x | 1.49x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 7.8x |
| Working Capital | $5.13B | $5.42B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.09B | $2.20B |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.51B | $1.73B |
| Capital Spending | -$588M | -$470M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 105.5% | 19.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 123.1% | 12.8% |
| FCF/Sales | 29.2% | 18.3% |
| CapEx/Sales | 11.4% | 5.0% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.46x | 0.34x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.6x | 4.3x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 3.3x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 5.6x | 8.8x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 79 days | 86 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 110 days |
| Payables Period | – | 64 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 131 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $5.16B | $9.45B |
| Operating Income | $877M | $1.56B |
| Net Income | $1.04B | $2.64B |
| R&D Expense | $2.96B | $2.44B |
| SG&A Expense | $1.17B | $904M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $127M | $4.52B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ARM | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.24 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 7.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | 1068M | 877M |
| Net Income Growth | 49.4% | – |
| EPS Growth | 48.5% | – |
ARM vs MRVL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ARM or MRVL?
ARM is 1.3 times larger than MRVL by market capitalization ($244.33B against $191.46B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ARM or MRVL?
MRVL trades at 68.7 times trailing earnings, ARM at 233.4 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, ARM or MRVL?
Over the last six months MRVL returned +32.2% and ARM +8.8%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ARM or MRVL?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.