CLS vs SANM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Celestica Inc (CLS) and Sanmina Corp (SANM) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CLS Celestica Inc
- Market Cap
- $32.78B
- P/E Ratio
- 23.0x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
SANM Sanmina Corp
- Market Cap
- $8.87B
- P/E Ratio
- 35.2x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- CLS is 3.7 times larger than SANM by market capitalization ($32.78B against $8.87B).
- CLS trades at 23.0 times trailing earnings, SANM at 35.2 times.
- CLS turns 6.8% of its revenue into net income, against 2.4% for SANM.
- SANM carries 2.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.44 times for CLS.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Printed Circuit Boards.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $32.78B | $8.87B |
| P/E Ratio | 23.02x | 35.23x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.28x | 3.22x |
| EPS | $11.29 | $4.70 |
| Book Value/Share | $49.27 | $51.49 |
| Revenue/Share | $144.56 | $238.13 |
| FCF/Share | $4.32 | $11.09 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.1% | 11.2% |
| ROA | 8.2% | 3.2% |
| ROIC | 20.4% | 9.9% |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | 2.4% |
| EBT Margin | 8.0% | 3.6% |
| Tax Rate | 14.4% | 28.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.61x | 1.78x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.03x | 1.06x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.44x | 2.53x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.44x | 3.53x |
| Interest Coverage | 25.7x | 7.8x |
| Working Capital | $4.77B | $3.43B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.41B | $901M |
| Free Cash Flow | $545M | $594M |
| Capital Spending | -$862M | -$307M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 166.9% | 90.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 44.2% | 63.3% |
| FCF/Sales | 3.0% | 4.7% |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.7% | 2.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.20x | 1.31x |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.6x | 3.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 13.8x | 12.1x |
| Days Inventory | 102 days | 99 days |
| Payables Period | 114 days | 77 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $18.23B | $12.76B |
| Operating Income | $1.50B | $530M |
| Net Income | $1.25B | $308M |
| R&D Expense | $169M | $34M |
| SG&A Expense | $364M | $411M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $16.14B | $11.61B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 126M | 54M |
| Net Income Growth | 85.4% | 18.9% |
| EPS Growth | 124.3% | -16.8% |
CLS vs SANM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CLS or SANM?
CLS is 3.7 times larger than SANM by market capitalization ($32.78B against $8.87B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CLS or SANM?
CLS trades at 23.0 times trailing earnings, SANM at 35.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CLS or SANM?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.