JBL vs SANM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Jabil Inc (JBL) and Sanmina Corp (SANM) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
JBL Jabil Inc
- Market Cap
- $27.91B
- P/E Ratio
- 27.3x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
SANM Sanmina Corp
- Market Cap
- $8.87B
- P/E Ratio
- 35.2x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
- NO CURRENT FORECAST
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- JBL is 3.1 times larger than SANM by market capitalization ($27.91B against $8.87B).
- JBL trades at 27.3 times trailing earnings, SANM at 35.2 times.
- JBL turns 2.9% of its revenue into net income, against 2.4% for SANM.
- JBL carries 16.01 times debt per unit of equity, against 2.53 times for SANM.
- JBL yields 0.13% in dividends; SANM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Printed Circuit Boards.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27.91B | $8.87B |
| P/E Ratio | 27.32x | 35.23x |
| P/B Ratio | 17.30x | 3.22x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | – |
| EPS | $9.75 | $4.70 |
| Book Value/Share | $15.39 | $51.49 |
| Revenue/Share | $343.11 | $238.13 |
| FCF/Share | $13.11 | $11.09 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 64.6% | 11.2% |
| ROA | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| ROIC | 29.6% | 9.9% |
| Gross Margin | 9.2% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| EBT Margin | 3.9% | 3.6% |
| Tax Rate | 26.1% | 28.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.99x | 1.78x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.65x | 1.06x |
| D/E Ratio | 16.01x | 2.53x |
| Financial Leverage | 17.01x | 3.53x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.2x | 7.8x |
| Working Capital | -$153M | $3.43B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.00B | $901M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.37B | $594M |
| Capital Spending | -$628M | -$307M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 22.1% | 90.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 17.2% | 63.3% |
| FCF/Sales | 3.8% | 4.7% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.31x | 1.31x |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.4x | 3.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 12.0x | 12.1x |
| Days Inventory | 83 days | 99 days |
| Payables Period | 162 days | 77 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $35.95B | $12.76B |
| Operating Income | $1.70B | $530M |
| Net Income | $1.04B | $308M |
| R&D Expense | $30M | $34M |
| SG&A Expense | $1.22B | $411M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $32.64B | $11.61B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | JBL | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.33 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 3.4% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 105M | 54M |
| Net Income Growth | 58.6% | 18.9% |
| EPS Growth | 64.7% | -16.8% |
JBL vs SANM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, JBL or SANM?
JBL is 3.1 times larger than SANM by market capitalization ($27.91B against $8.87B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, JBL or SANM?
JBL trades at 27.3 times trailing earnings, SANM at 35.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, JBL or SANM?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.