CWST vs GFL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Casella Waste Systems Inc (CWST) and Gfl Environmental Inc. (GFL) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CWST Casella Waste Systems Inc
- Market Cap
- $6.23B
- P/E Ratio
- 978.9x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
GFL Gfl Environmental Inc.
- Price
- $45.98 +21.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $20.08B
- P/E Ratio
- 9.6x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- GFL is 3.2 times larger than CWST by market capitalization ($20.08B against $6.23B).
- GFL trades at 9.6 times trailing earnings, CWST at 978.9 times.
- GFL turns 9.9% of its revenue into net income, against 0.3% for CWST.
- GFL carries 1.62 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.25 times for CWST.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Refuse Systems.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.23B | $20.08B |
| P/E Ratio | 978.90x | 9.62x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.94x | – |
| EPS | $0.10 | $4.78 |
| Book Value/Share | $24.83 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $30.73 | $47.18 |
| FCF/Share | $1.66 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4% | 39.0% |
| ROA | 0.2% | 14.7% |
| ROIC | 2.0% | – |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | – |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 9.9% |
| EBT Margin | 0.5% | -3.1% |
| Tax Rate | 35.5% | 26.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.99x | 0.58x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 0.55x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.25x | 1.62x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.25x | 2.64x |
| Interest Coverage | 1.1x | – |
| Working Capital | -$2M | -$607M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $351M | $3.54B |
| Free Cash Flow | $106M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$245M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 2.9% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 16.1% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 5.4% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 12.6% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.55x | 1.49x |
| Receivables Turnover | 8.9x | 35.9x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 391.4x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.4x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 41 days | 10 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 1 days |
| Payables Period | 35 days | 29 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | -18 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.96B | $20.61B |
| Operating Income | $66M | – |
| Net Income | $6M | $2.04B |
| SG&A Expense | – | $2.65B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.30B | $17.08B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 64M | 437M |
| Net Income Growth | -48.4% | – |
| EPS Growth | -47.4% | – |
CWST vs GFL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CWST or GFL?
GFL is 3.2 times larger than CWST by market capitalization ($20.08B against $6.23B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CWST or GFL?
GFL trades at 9.6 times trailing earnings, CWST at 978.9 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CWST or GFL?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.