HKHC vs VRTS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Horizon Kinetics Holding Corp (HKHC) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
HKHC Horizon Kinetics Holding Corp
- Market Cap
- $410M
- P/E Ratio
- 8.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $804M
- P/E Ratio
- 6.9x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- VRTS is 2.0 times larger than HKHC by market capitalization ($804M against $410M).
- VRTS trades at 6.9 times trailing earnings, HKHC at 8.8 times.
- HKHC turns 66.5% of its revenue into net income, against 13.7% for VRTS.
- VRTS carries 3.58 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.41 times for HKHC.
- VRTS yields 8.18% in dividends and HKHC 1.93%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Investment Advice.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $410M | $804M |
| P/E Ratio | 8.79x | 6.93x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.05x | 0.85x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% | 8.18% |
| EPS | $2.50 | $17.53 |
| Book Value/Share | $20.85 | $142.73 |
| Revenue/Share | $3.79 | $124.62 |
| FCF/Share | – | $-7.84 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.1% | 11.9% |
| ROA | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 15.7% |
| Net Margin | 66.5% | 13.7% |
| EBT Margin | 54.1% | 19.1% |
| Tax Rate | -15.5% | 26.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| D/E Ratio | 0.41x | 3.58x |
| Financial Leverage | 5.00x | 4.80x |
| Interest Coverage | 70.7x | 2.1x |
Cash Flow
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$30M | -$46M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | -$52M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$6M |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | -219.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -265.1% |
| FCF/Sales | – | -6.3% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 0.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.04x | 0.18x |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.4x | 8.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 45.4x | 37.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 35 days | 45 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $71M | $825M |
| Operating Income | $6M | $130M |
| Net Income | $47M | $113M |
| SG&A Expense | $3M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | HKHC | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.42 | $9.93 |
| Payout Ratio | 16.8% | 56.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 19M | 7M |
| Net Income Growth | -55.6% | -22.4% |
| EPS Growth | -56.7% | -14.6% |
HKHC vs VRTS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, HKHC or VRTS?
VRTS is 2.0 times larger than HKHC by market capitalization ($804M against $410M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, HKHC or VRTS?
VRTS trades at 6.9 times trailing earnings, HKHC at 8.8 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, HKHC or VRTS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.