LAD vs MUSA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Lithia Motors Inc (LAD) and Murphy Usa Inc. (MUSA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
LAD Lithia Motors Inc
- Price
- $309.66 +9.8% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $6.46B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.6x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
MUSA Murphy Usa Inc.
- Market Cap
- $9.43B
- P/E Ratio
- 14.5x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- MUSA is 1.5 times larger than LAD by market capitalization ($9.43B against $6.46B).
- LAD trades at 8.6 times trailing earnings, MUSA at 14.5 times.
- MUSA turns 2.9% of its revenue into net income, against 2.1% for LAD.
- MUSA carries 5.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 3.05 times for LAD.
- LAD yields 0.84% in dividends and MUSA 0.50%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.46B | $9.43B |
| P/E Ratio | 8.55x | 14.46x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.98x | 11.88x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 0.50% |
| EPS | $34.94 | $35.48 |
| Book Value/Share | $305.94 | $43.19 |
| Revenue/Share | $1767.19 | $1265.41 |
| FCF/Share | $-19.74 | $36.32 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.9% | 83.6% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 12.8% |
| ROIC | 8.4% | 24.4% |
| Gross Margin | 15.1% | – |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | 2.9% |
| EBT Margin | 2.8% | 3.7% |
| Tax Rate | 26.1% | 23.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00x | 0.87x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.21x | 0.53x |
| D/E Ratio | 3.05x | 5.53x |
| Financial Leverage | 4.06x | 6.53x |
| Interest Coverage | 6.7x | 8.5x |
| Working Capital | -$12M | -$147M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$81M | $1.15B |
| Free Cash Flow | -$427M | $668M |
| Capital Spending | -$346M | -$481M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -127.5% | 40.6% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 81.8% |
| FCF/Sales | -1.1% | 2.9% |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.9% | 2.1% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.42x | 4.49x |
| Receivables Turnover | 33.7x | 61.5x |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.9x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 7.5x | 7.7x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 11 days | 6 days |
| Days Inventory | 75 days | – |
| Payables Period | 5 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 81 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $38.21B | $23.26B |
| Operating Income | $1.55B | $980M |
| Net Income | $788M | $663M |
| SG&A Expense | $4.07B | $242M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $32.42B | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | LAD | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $2.51 | $2.57 |
| Payout Ratio | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 22M | 18M |
| Net Income Growth | -12.3% | 40.8% |
| EPS Growth | 1.2% | 50.2% |
LAD vs MUSA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, LAD or MUSA?
MUSA is 1.5 times larger than LAD by market capitalization ($9.43B against $6.46B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, LAD or MUSA?
LAD trades at 8.6 times trailing earnings, MUSA at 14.5 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, LAD or MUSA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.