MUSA vs PAG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Murphy Usa Inc. (MUSA) and Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
MUSA Murphy Usa Inc.
- Market Cap
- $9.43B
- P/E Ratio
- 14.5x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
PAG Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $14.00B
- P/E Ratio
- 14.9x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- PAG is 1.5 times larger than MUSA by market capitalization ($14.00B against $9.43B).
- MUSA trades at 14.5 times trailing earnings, PAG at 14.9 times.
- MUSA turns 2.9% of its revenue into net income, against 2.8% for PAG.
- MUSA carries 5.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 2.10 times for PAG.
- PAG yields 2.66% in dividends and MUSA 0.50%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.43B | $14.00B |
| P/E Ratio | 14.46x | 14.87x |
| P/B Ratio | 11.88x | 2.36x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 2.66% |
| EPS | $35.48 | $14.34 |
| Book Value/Share | $43.19 | $90.52 |
| Revenue/Share | $1265.41 | $512.29 |
| FCF/Share | $36.32 | $8.11 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 83.6% | 15.9% |
| ROA | 12.8% | 5.1% |
| ROIC | 24.4% | 10.5% |
| Gross Margin | – | 16.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| EBT Margin | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Tax Rate | 23.6% | 25.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.87x | 0.98x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.53x | 0.21x |
| D/E Ratio | 5.53x | 2.10x |
| Financial Leverage | 6.53x | 3.10x |
| Interest Coverage | 8.5x | 4.7x |
| Working Capital | -$147M | -$108M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.15B | $848M |
| Free Cash Flow | $668M | $533M |
| Capital Spending | -$481M | -$315M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 40.6% | -20.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 81.8% | -29.6% |
| FCF/Sales | 2.9% | 1.6% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.1% | 0.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 4.49x | 1.83x |
| Receivables Turnover | 61.5x | 32.1x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 5.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 7.7x | 10.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 6 days | 11 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 65 days |
| Payables Period | – | 12 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 64 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $23.26B | $33.64B |
| Operating Income | $980M | $1.25B |
| Net Income | $663M | $944M |
| SG&A Expense | $242M | $3.95B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $28.26B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | MUSA | PAG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $2.57 | $5.67 |
| Payout Ratio | 7.2% | 39.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | 18M | 66M |
| Net Income Growth | 40.8% | 0.0% |
| EPS Growth | 50.2% | 1.0% |
MUSA vs PAG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, MUSA or PAG?
PAG is 1.5 times larger than MUSA by market capitalization ($14.00B against $9.43B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, MUSA or PAG?
MUSA trades at 14.5 times trailing earnings, PAG at 14.9 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, MUSA or PAG?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.