MATX vs NCLH: stock comparison and AI forecast
Matson, Inc. (MATX) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
MATX Matson, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $6.61B
- P/E Ratio
- 14.9x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
- Price
- $17.94 +4.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $8.24B
- P/E Ratio
- 15.9x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- NCLH is 1.2 times larger than MATX by market capitalization ($8.24B against $6.61B).
- MATX trades at 14.9 times trailing earnings, NCLH at 15.9 times.
- NCLH carries 6.63 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.70 times for MATX.
- MATX yields 0.67% in dividends; NCLH pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Water Transportation.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.61B | $8.24B |
| P/E Ratio | 14.91x | 15.88x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.38x | 2.62x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | – |
| EPS | $14.83 | $1.13 |
| Book Value/Share | $92.74 | $6.86 |
| Revenue/Share | $115.68 | $22.13 |
| FCF/Share | – | $-1.23 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.7% | – |
| ROA | 9.8% | – |
| ROIC | 12.8% | 7.7% |
| Gross Margin | -135.9% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 13.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | – |
| EBT Margin | 15.9% | 8.1% |
| Tax Rate | 15.9% | -1.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89x | 0.22x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 0.19x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.70x | 6.63x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.70x | 7.63x |
| Interest Coverage | 63.6x | 152.2x |
| Working Capital | -$68M | -$4.46B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $584M | $2.17B |
| Free Cash Flow | – | -$564M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$2.73B |
| OCF Growth YoY | -5.5% | 6.7% |
| FCF/Sales | – | -5.5% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 26.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.73x | 0.42x |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.3x | 42.1x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 31.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.3x | 0.5x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 35 days | 9 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 12 days |
| Payables Period | 13 days | 11 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 9 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $3.46B | $10.16B |
| Operating Income | $525M | $1.41B |
| Net Income | $464M | – |
| SG&A Expense | – | $1.63B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $8.16B | $5.96B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | MATX | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.49 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 10.1% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 30M | 459M |
| Net Income Growth | -6.1% | – |
| EPS Growth | 1.0% | -37.2% |
MATX vs NCLH: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, MATX or NCLH?
NCLH is 1.2 times larger than MATX by market capitalization ($8.24B against $6.61B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, MATX or NCLH?
MATX trades at 14.9 times trailing earnings, NCLH at 15.9 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, MATX or NCLH?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.