MMS vs SEZL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
MMS Maximus, Inc.
- Price
- $65.46 +0.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $3.43B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.8x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
SEZL Sezzle Inc.
- Price
- $122.43 +43.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $4.12B
- P/E Ratio
- 26.7x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- SEZL is 1.2 times larger than MMS by market capitalization ($4.12B against $3.43B).
- MMS trades at 8.8 times trailing earnings, SEZL at 26.7 times.
- Over the last six months SEZL returned +43.7% and MMS +0.4%.
- SEZL turns 30.4% of its revenue into net income, against 7.1% for MMS.
- MMS carries 1.51 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.96 times for SEZL.
- MMS yields 1.99% in dividends; SEZL pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Business Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.43B | $4.12B |
| P/E Ratio | 8.83x | 26.73x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.97x | 17.70x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | – |
| EPS | $7.41 | $4.58 |
| Book Value/Share | $33.24 | $6.92 |
| Revenue/Share | $100.24 | $15.79 |
| FCF/Share | $8.27 | $9.73 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.3% | 69.3% |
| ROA | 8.5% | 35.4% |
| ROIC | 15.7% | 60.5% |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | – |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 40.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 30.4% |
| EBT Margin | 9.4% | 37.8% |
| Tax Rate | 24.5% | 19.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.42x | 4.02x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.51x | 0.96x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.51x | 1.96x |
| Interest Coverage | 7.0x | 13.9x |
| Working Capital | $963M | $307M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $470M | $329M |
| Free Cash Flow | $433M | $328M |
| Capital Spending | -$36M | -$990K |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | 1025.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 1040.4% |
| FCF/Sales | 8.2% | 61.6% |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.7% | 0.2% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.20x | 1.17x |
| Receivables Turnover | 3.8x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 184.2x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 96 days | – |
| Payables Period | 25 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $5.25B | $532M |
| Operating Income | $579M | $215M |
| Net Income | $371M | $161M |
| SG&A Expense | $681M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $3.91B | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | MMS | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.30 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 17.5% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 52M | 34M |
| Net Income Growth | 17.3% | 54.4% |
| EPS Growth | 56.7% | 56.7% |
MMS vs SEZL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, MMS or SEZL?
SEZL is 1.2 times larger than MMS by market capitalization ($4.12B against $3.43B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, MMS or SEZL?
MMS trades at 8.8 times trailing earnings, SEZL at 26.7 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, MMS or SEZL?
Over the last six months SEZL returned +43.7% and MMS +0.4%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, MMS or SEZL?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.